In June 2023, technology leaders and IT services executives had a lightning bolt headed their way when McKinsey published the “The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier” report. It echoed a moment from the 2010s when Amazon Web Services launched an advertising campaign aimed at Main Street’s C-suite: Why would any fiscally responsible exec allow their IT teams to spend capex for servers and software when AWS only cost 10 cents per virtual machine? 

Vendors understand that these kinds of reports and aggressive advertising around competitive risks projected onto an industry sector would drive many calls from boards to their C-suite, rolling from C-suite to their staff all asking, “What are we doing with AI?” When asked to “do something with AI,” technical leadership and their organizations promptly responded — sometimes begrudgingly and sometimes excitedly — for work-sanctioned opportunities to get their hands on a new technology. At that point, there was no time to sort between actual business returns from applying AI and “AI novelty” use cases that were more Rube Goldberg machines than tangible breakthroughs. 

Today’s opportunity: Significant automation gains 

When leaders respond to immediate panic, new business risks and mitigations often emerge.  Two recent examples highlight the consequences of rushing to implement and publish positive results from AI adoption. The Wall Street Journal reported in April 2025 on companies struggling to realize returns on AI. Just weeks later, it covered MIT’s retraction of a technical paper about AI where the results that led to its publication could not be substantiated.  

While these reports demonstrate the pitfalls of over-reliance on AI without common-sense guardrails, not all is off track in the land of enterprise AI adoption. Incredible results being found from judicious use of AI and related technologies in automating processes across industries. Now that we are through the “fear of missing out” stage and can get down to business, where are the best places to look for value when applying AI to automation of your business?  

While chatbots are almost as pervasive as new app downloads for mobile phones, the applications of AI realizing automation and productivity gains line up with the unique purpose and architecture of the underlying AI system they are built on. The dominant patterns where AI gains are realized currently boil down to two things: language (translation and patterns) and data (new format creation and data search).  

Example one: Natural language processing  

Manufacturing automation challenge: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is both critical and often labor intensive. It is not always performed prior to a failure in manufacturing equipment, so very often FMEA occurs in a stressful manufacturing lines-down scenario. In Intel’s case, a global footprint of manufacturing facilities separated by large distances along with time zones and preferred language differences makes this even more difficult to find the root cause of a problem. Weeks of engineering effort are spent per FMEA analysis repeated across large fleets of tools spread between these facilities.  

Solution: Leverage already deployed CPU compute servers for natural language processing (NLP) across the manufacturing tool logs, where observations about the tools’ operations are maintained by the local manufacturing technicians. The analysis also applied sentiment analysis to classify words as positive, negative, or neutral. The new system performed FMEA on six months of data in under one minute, saving weeks of engineering time and allowing the manufacturing line to proactively service equipment on a pre-emptive schedule rather than incurring unexpected downtime.  

Financial institution challenge: Programming languages commonly used by software engineers have evolved. Mature bellwether institutions were often formed through a series of mergers and acquisitions over the years, and they continue to rely on critical systems that are based on 30-year-old programming languages that current-day software engineers are not familiar with. 

Solution: Use NLP to translate between the old and new programming languages, giving software engineers a needed boost to improve the serviceability of critical operational systems. Use the power of AI rather than doing a risky rewrite or massive upgrade. 

Example two: Company product specifications and generative AI models 

Sales automation challenge: The time it takes to reformat a company’s product data into a specific customer RFP format has been an ongoing challenge across industries. Teams of sales and technical leads spend weeks of work across different accounts reformatting the same root data between the preferred PowerPoint or Word document formats. The customer response times were measured in weeks, especially if the RFPs required legal reviews. 

Solution: By using generative AI combined with a data extraction and prompting technique called retrieval augmented generation (RAG), companies can rapidly reformat product information between different customer required RFP response formats. The time spent moving data between different documents and different document types only to find an unforced error in the move is reduced to hours instead of weeks.  

HR policy automation challenge: Navigating internal processes can be time consuming and confusing for both HR and employees. The consequences of misinterpretation, access outages, and personal information or private data being exposed are massively important to the company and the individual. 

Solution: Combine generative AI, RAG, and an interactive chatbot that uses employee-assigned assets to determine identity and access rights, provides employees interactive query-based chat formats to answer their questions in real time. 

Finding your best use cases for AI 

In a world where 80% to 90% of all AI proof of concepts fail to scale, now is the time to develop a framework that is based on caution. Consider starting with a data strategy and governance assessment. Then find opportunities to compare successful AI-based automation efforts at peer companies through peer discussions. Clear, rules-based policies and processes offer the best opportunities to begin a successful AI automation journey in your enterprise. Where you encounter disparate data sources (e.g., unstructured, video, structured databases) or unclear processes, maintain tighter human-in-the-loop decision controls to avoid unexpected data or token exposure and cost overruns. 

As the AI hype cycle cools and business pressure mounts, now is the time to become practical. Apply AI to well-defined use cases and begin unlocking the automation benefits that will matter not just in 2025, but for years to come.

This content was produced by Intel. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff.

Read more

Adaptive production is more than a technological upgrade: it is a paradigm shift. This new frontier enables the integration of cutting-edge technologies to create an increasingly autonomous environment, where interconnected manufacturing plants go beyond the limits of traditional automation. Artificial intelligence, digital twins, and robotics are among the powerful tools manufacturers are using to create dynamic, intelligent systems that not only perform tasks, but also learn, make decisions, and evolve in real-time.

Taking this kind of adaptive approach can transform a manufacturer’s productivity, efficiency, and innovation. But beyond the factory, it also has the potential to deliver society-wide benefits, by bolstering economic growth locally, creating more attractive and accessible employment opportunities, and supporting a sustainability agenda.

As efforts to revive and modernize local manufacturing accelerate in regions around the world, including North America and Europe, adaptive production could help manufacturers overcome some of their biggest obstacles—firstly, attracting and retaining talent. Nearly 60% of manufacturers cited this as their top challenge in a 2024 US-based survey. Highly automated, technology-led adaptive production methods hold new promise for attracting talent to roles that are safer, less repetitive, and better paid. “The ideal scenario is one where AI enhances human capabilities, leads to new task creation, and empowers the people who are most at risk from automation’s impact on certain jobs, particularly those without college degrees,” says Simon Johnson, co-director of MIT’s Shaping the Future of Work Initiative.

Secondly, the digitalization of manufacturing—embedded in the very foundation of adaptive production technologies—allows companies to better address complex sustainability challenges through process and resource optimization and a better understanding of data. “By integrating these advanced technologies, we gain a more comprehensive picture across the entire production process and product lifecycle,” explains Jelena Mitic, head of technology for the Future of Automation at Siemens. “This will provide a much faster and more efficient way to optimize operations and ensure that all the necessary safety and sustainability requirements are met during quality control.”

Download the full report.

This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff.

This content was researched, designed, and written entirely by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.

Read more

As soon as Google launched its latest video-generating AI model at the end of May, creatives rushed to put it through its paces. Released just months after its predecessor, Veo 3 allows users to generate sounds and dialogue for the first time, sparking a flurry of hyperrealistic eight-second clips stitched together into ads, ASMR videos, imagined film trailers, and humorous street interviews. Academy Award–nominated director Darren Aronofsky used the tool to create a short film called Ancestra. During a press briefing, Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO, likened the leap forward to “emerging from the silent era of video generation.” 

But others quickly found that in some ways the tool wasn’t behaving as expected. When it generates clips that include dialogue, Veo 3 often adds nonsensical, garbled subtitles, even when the prompts it’s been given explicitly ask for no captions or subtitles to be added. 

Getting rid of them isn’t straightforward—or cheap. Users have been forced to resort to regenerating clips (which costs them more money), using external subtitle-removing tools, or cropping their videos to get rid of the subtitles altogether.

Josh Woodward, vice president of Google Labs and Gemini, posted on X on June 9 that Google had developed fixes to reduce the gibberish text. But over a month later, users are still logging issues with it in Google Labs’ Discord channel, demonstrating how difficult it can be to correct issues in major AI models.

Like its predecessors, Veo 3 is available to paying members of Google’s subscription tiers, which start at $249.99 a month. To generate an eight-second clip, users enter a text prompt describing the scene they’d like to create into Google’s AI filmmaking tool Flow, Gemini, or other Google platforms. Each Veo 3 generation costs a minimum of 20 AI credits, and the account can be topped up at a cost of $25 per 2,500 credits.

Mona Weiss, an advertising creative director, says that regenerating her scenes in a bid to get rid of the random captions is becoming expensive. “If you’re creating a scene with dialogue, up to 40% of its output has gibberish subtitles that make it unusable,” she says. “You’re burning through money trying to get a scene you like, but then you can’t even use it.”

When Weiss reported the problem to Google Labs through its Discord channel in the hopes of getting a refund for her wasted credits, its team pointed her to the company’s official support team. They offered her a refund for the cost of Veo 3, but not for the credits. Weiss declined, as accepting would have meant losing access to the model altogether. The Google Labs’ Discord support team has been telling users that subtitles can be triggered by speech, saying that they’re aware of the problem and are working to fix it. 

So why does Veo 3 insist on adding these subtitles, and why does it appear to be so difficult to solve the problem? It probably comes down to what the model has been trained on.  

Although Google hasn’t made this information public, that training data is likely to include YouTube videos, clips from vlogs and gaming channels, and TikTok edits, many of which come with subtitles. These embedded subtitles are part of the video frames rather than separate text tracks layered on top, meaning it’s difficult to remove them before they’re used for training, says Shuo Niu, an assistant professor at Clark University in Massachusetts who studies video sharing platforms and AI.

“The text-to-video model is trained using reinforcement learning to produce content that mimics human-created videos, and if such videos include subtitles, the model may ‘learn’ that incorporating subtitles enhances similarity with human-generated content,” he says.

“We’re continuously working to improve video creation, especially with text, speech that sounds natural, and audio that syncs perfectly,” a Google spokesperson says. “We encourage users to try their prompt again if they notice an inconsistency and give us feedback using the thumbs up/down option.”

As for why the model ignores instructions such as “No subtitles,” negative prompts (telling a generative AI model not to do something) are usually less effective than positive ones, says Tuhin Chakrabarty, an assistant professor at Stony Brook University who studies AI systems. 

To fix the problem, Google would have to check every frame of each video Veo 3 has been trained on, and either get rid of or relabel those with captions before retraining the model—an endeavor that would take weeks, he says. 

Katerina Cizek, a documentary maker and artistic director at the MIT Open Documentary Lab, believes the problem exemplifies Google’s willingness to launch products before they’re fully ready. 

“Google needed a win,” she says. “They needed to be the first to pump out a tool that generates lip-synched audio. And so that was more important than fixing their subtitle issue.”  

Read more

When Darren Riley moved to Detroit seven years ago, he didn’t expect the city’s air to change his life—literally. Developing asthma as an adult opened his eyes to a much larger problem: the invisible but pervasive impact of air pollution on the health of marginalized communities.

“I was fascinated about why we don’t have the data we need,” Riley recalls, “or why we don’t have the infrastructure to solve these issues, to understand where pollution is coming from, how it’s impacting our communities, so that we can solve these problems and make an equitable breathing environment for everybody.”

That personal reckoning sparked the idea for JustAir, a Michigan-based clean-tech startup building neighborhood-level air quality monitoring tools. The goal is simple but urgent: provide communities with access to hyper-local data so they can better manage pollution and protect public health. As Riley puts it, “JustAir is solving the problem of how to better manage local pollution so that we can make sure our communities, our lifestyles—where we work, where we play, and where we learn—are really protected.”

Founded during the height of the pandemic, when the connection between health disparities and air quality became impossible to ignore, JustAir now partners with local governments, health departments, and community residents to deploy monitoring networks that offer key data relevant to everything from policy to personal decision-making.

From the start, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) offered key support that helped turn JustAir’s bold vision into technical infrastructure. Through the MEDC’s early-stage funding partners and a network of mentorship and resources known as SmartZones, JustAir sharpened its product-market fit and gained critical momentum.

Success for Riley isn’t just about scale, it’s about impact. “It warms my heart, and it shows that we’re doing exactly what we said we wanted to do,” Riley says, “which is to make sure that communities have the data that they deserve to create the future, the clean, healthy future that they desperately need.”

To other burgeoning entrepreneurs, Riley sees a sense of community as key to lasting and impactful change. “When people are celebrating you with your head up, and then when people are helping you put your chin up when your head’s down, I think it’s so, so critical. I found that here in Michigan, and also found it here in our community, right here in Detroit. Passion and finding a community that’s going to help get you through the journey is all it takes.”

This episode of Business Lab is produced in association with the Michigan Economic Development Corporation.

Full Transcript

Megan Tatum: From MIT Technology Review, I’m Megan Tatum, and this is Business Lab, the show that helps business leaders make sense of new technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace.

Today’s episode is brought to you in partnership with the Michigan Economic Development Corporation.

Our topic today is building a technology startup in the U.S. state of Michigan. Taking an innovative idea to a full-fledged product and company requires resources that individuals might not have. That’s why the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, the MEDC, has launched an innovation campaign to support technology entrepreneurs.

Two words for you: startup ecosystem.

My guest is Darren Riley, the co-founder and CEO at JustAir, a clean air startup that began its journey in Michigan.

Welcome, Darren.

Darren Riley: Hi. Thanks for having me.

Megan: Thank you ever so much for being with us. To get us started, let’s just talk a bit about JustAir. How did the idea for the company come about, and what does your company do as well?

Darren: Yeah, absolutely. The real thesis of JustAir, is really a combination of one, my personal experience but also my professional experience. On the professional side, background in software engineering, graduated from Carnegie Mellon University, but I was always fascinated by how to use technology to really support and innovate and really push the frontier on issues that are near and dear to my heart. Coming from Houston, Texas, coming from communities that often are restricted with certain issues, systemic issues, is something that I always carried in my heart.

And on the personal side, it was around seven years ago when I moved to Detroit, in Southwest Detroit, where I developed asthma. Not growing up with asthma and not developing any issues, having that disease of the lungs really opened my eyes to just how much our environment impacts our health and well-being.

The combination of those, that pain point and also my background in technology, I was fascinated about why we don’t have the data we need or why we don’t have the infrastructure to solve these issues, to understand where pollution is coming from, how it’s impacting our communities, so that we can solve these problems and make an equitable breathing environment for everybody. That’s kind of what birthed JustAir in a way.

And actually, it was around COVID-19 where we really started to push forward, where we saw all this information and research around health disparities and a lot of the issues of mortality rates around COVID-19, which kind of coincides with COPD, asthma, and other diseases that are often overburdened in communities that look like ours, in Black and brown communities. That’s kind of where we got our start.

And what is JustAir today? JustAir is solving the problem of how to better manage local pollution so that we can make sure our communities, our lifestyles—where we work, where we play, and where we learn—are really protected. And, so, what JustAir does is build hyper-local neighborhood-level air quality monitoring networks. Communities have access to the data, policymakers and decision-makers can use that data to really influence and push things to help protect the community, but also other stakeholders can use the data to move the environment to a healthier state. So that’s where we are, and we’re four years strong, and I’m really excited to be a part of this journey here in Michigan.

Megan: So you launched about four years ago now. Why did you choose to build and grow just there in Michigan?

Darren: Yeah, I think a combination of things, the reason why I chose to start here and be intentional about building our team here. I think first is really around the ecosystem support around Michigan. So the MEDC has a network of what we call SmartZones that really offer funding, resources, mentorship, advisory on the different challenges that can range from capital, legal, and other issues that kind of hold an entrepreneur from just getting out there and putting their product in the market. First and foremost, I’m super thankful and grateful for just the state really focusing on and putting entrepreneurs first in that regard.

I think secondly is community. I really felt a strong sense of community here in Detroit. One of the founding members of an organization called Black Tech Saturdays, which sees over hundreds, 500-1,000 folks almost every Saturday of the month, just really sharing and really engaging with tech-curious folks from all different walks of life, but making intentional space for folks who are often left out of those rooms and out of those conversations. And just really seeing a peer network of entrepreneurs who come from a similar cultural background or a similar situation, really going after it together and helping each other navigate some issues.

And then lastly, I talk about this a lot, but problem-solution fit. Being here in Detroit where I developed asthma, where we have many issues and many around the environment that have hit some communities the hardest, right here in Detroit in my own backyard I really want to be very narrowly focused and make sure that I’m building something that actually solves the problem that got me on this journey in the first place. Not thinking about regional-wide, different country, international, et cetera, but how do we build something right here in the backyard that solves the problem for my neighbors and makes sure that we can make a real difference in the community. So, from the community to the problem that I really care about and make sure we solve, and then also just the ecosystem support is why we’re here in Michigan and why we plan to really grow and really be a part of this movement.

Megan: Fantastic. And you’ve touched on a few of those already, but as you were getting started, what specific resources, partnerships, or community support helped you navigate the early-stage research and development stages?

Darren: One example, really early, actually, I forgot about this for a while, but we have a Business Accelerator Fund here in Michigan where there’s funding offered to entrepreneurs for technical assistance. I used that to operationalize some of our technical roadmap processes to build out the infrastructure that we really intended to do. So, that real funding that was non-dilutive that the state provided helped accelerate some of those issues in the early days, where it was just myself and advisors going after this problem. And so now, where we are today, there are funds that receive funding from MEDC, so local funds and venture capital that help you get your first check. Those are really helpful as well. All that to say is basically a combination of funding primary source, but also strategically, that funding is going towards product positioning and product-market fit. Those were some of the two core examples that have been beneficial.

And then, I think the last thing I’ll mention as well, MEDC and a lot of the SmartZones within the state, these SmartZones are just bucketed in different regions and areas, so you have Ann Arbor, you’ve got Detroit, you have Grand Rapids, the whole nine yards, having these events and creating these clusters, if you will, of density of entrepreneurs, I think is super, super critical. I’ve experienced in New York, Chicago, and San Francisco, and other bigger ecosystems that density is so critical to where you’re constantly rubbing shoulders with the next entrepreneur, the next investor, the next customer, to really kind of accelerate that velocity of your journey.

Megan: Yeah. Having that ecosystem makes such a difference, doesn’t it?

Darren: Oh yeah, absolutely.

Megan: And tech acumen and business acumen are very different sets of skills. I wonder what was the process like developing out your technology whilst also building out a viable business plan?

Darren: I think I have a real unique opportunity. Having a software background, I code all the time, felt I had a lot of ideas, always joked that I had a Google Drive of 30 ideas that never worked, that I never showed anybody. I really felt I had that piece. What I was missing in my journey and why nothing ever came to fruition was just the simple principles of, are you solving a real problem, a real pain point for a customer?

Two things on the business acumen side are having an affinity for the problem. I truly believe that going on the entrepreneurial journey is lonely, it’s risky, it’s stressful, and tiring. The more I can wake up in the morning and think about [how] the problems that we solve could actually result in a breath of clean air for someone who may not have that awareness or have the tools to advocate on their behalf, just having that extra motivation and having that affinity towards a problem that I feel really deeply, I think does help.

But I think also from the business acumen side of things, I had the opportunity to work at an organization called Endeavor based here in Michigan, where I was on the other side of an entrepreneur resource support organization. I got to see founders from high-growth companies throughout Michigan, series A, series B, retail, fintech, the whole nine yards, health tech, and seeing where are the challenges, where are things going well and where things are going wrong, from co-founder struggles to missing the market timing or going through banking issues from a couple years ago and all that stuff. All those things really help build a muscle memory of, I don’t have all the answers, but being able to pull through those experiences and pattern matching does help as well, from how you actually build a business from zero, from product-market fit to scale and grow.

Megan: Yeah, absolutely. And as you say, it can be a stressful journey, life as an entrepreneur, but I wonder if you could also share some highlights from your journey so far, any partnerships or projects that you’re really excited about at the moment?

Darren: I think the first and foremost highlight [that] I didn’t realize I would come to enjoy so much is certainly my team. Being able to work with people who are aligned in passionate values and just kind of the culture and the focus is immensely valuable. If I’m going to spend this many hours in a week or in a year, I’d love to spend it with folks who are really passionate about it. I want to see them succeed. So I think first and foremost, I think the biggest success is really just the fortunate opportunity to work with people I really enjoy working with.

The others I’ll mention [are] we have one of the largest county-owned monitoring networks in the country within Wayne County. The Health Department of Wayne County and Executive Warren Evans established this partnership where we deployed 100 fixed monitors throughout Wayne County to understand the patterns of local pollution to where we can help combat some of these issues where we are ranked F in air quality from the Lung Association, or Detroit is the third-worst from Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, the third-worst place to live in with asthma. So, how do we really look at this data and tell the story, and how can we really mitigate solutions, while also giving data to the public so that they can navigate the world that’s happening to them. That’s one of our critical partnerships.

We’re also very excited, we just got announced in Fast Company as one of the most innovative companies of 2025, so woo-hoo to that.

Megan: Congratulations.

Darren: It is really exciting, yeah, in the social impact, social good category. There are many, many more, but I think the last one, I’m so, so grateful for, and I tell our team this all the time, is that we’ve already succeeded. Going to community meetings, hearing people raise their hand, asking questions about the adjuster application or about their data, and I to emphasize that when you hear community members saying ‘our data’ and not an ask, but as something that they have obtained, it warms my heart, and it shows that we’re doing exactly what we said we wanted to do, which is to make sure that communities have the data that they deserve to create the future, the clean, healthy future that they desperately need.”.

Megan: Yeah, absolutely, what an incredible achievement. And what advice, finally, would you offer to other burgeoning entrepreneurs?

Darren: Yeah, I think really something you are passionate about. Repeat that point again, do something that you feel that you can really go through those pain points and struggles for, [because] you need some extra kick to get you through and navigate these challenges.

The second thing, and the most important thing that a lot of people take away is community, community, community. I wouldn’t be here today if I didn’t have people to call on when I’m at my lowest points, and call on people in my highest points. When people are celebrating you with your head up, and then when people are helping you put your chin up when your head’s down, I think it’s so, so critical. I found that here in Michigan, and also found it here in our community, right here in Detroit. Passion and finding a community that’s going to help get you through the journey is all it takes.

Megan: Fantastic. All great advice. Thank you ever so much, Darren.

Darren: Absolutely.

Megan: That was Darren Riley, the co-founder and CEO at JustAir whom I spoke with from Brighton, England.

That’s it for this episode of Business Lab. I’m your host, Megan Tatum. I’m a contributing editor and host for Insights, the custom publishing division of MIT Technology Review. We were founded in 1899 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and you can find us in print on the web and at events each year around the world. For more information about us on the show, please check out our website at technologyreview.com.

This show is available wherever you get your podcasts. And if you enjoyed this episode, we hope you’ll take a moment to rate and review us. Business Lab is a production of MIT Technology Review. This episode was produced by Giro Studios. Thanks for listening.

This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff.

This content was researched, designed, and written entirely by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.

Read more

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

AI text-to-speech programs could one day “unlearn” how to imitate certain people

The news: A new technique known as “machine unlearning” could be used to teach AI models to forget specific voices.

How it works: Currently, companies tend to deal with this issue by checking whether the prompts or the AI’s responses contain disallowed material. Machine unlearning instead asks whether an AI can be made to forget a piece of information that the company doesn’t want it to know. It works by taking a model and the specific data to be redacted then using them to create a new model—essentially, a version of the original that never learned that piece of data.

Why it matters: This could be an important step in stopping the rise of audio deepfakes, where someone’s voice is copied to carry out fraud or scams. Read the full story.

—Peter Hall

AI’s giants want to take over the classroom

School’s out and it’s high summer, but a bunch of teachers are plotting how they’re going to use AI this upcoming school year. God help them.

On July 8, OpenAI, Microsoft, and Anthropic announced a $23 million partnership with one of the largest teachers’ unions in the United States to bring more AI into K–12 classrooms. They will train teachers at a New York City headquarters on how to use AI both for teaching and for tasks like planning lessons and writing reports, starting this fall.

But these companies could face an uphill battle. There’s a lack of clear evidence that AI can be a net benefit for students, and it’s hard to trust that the AI companies funding this initiative will give honest advice on when not to use AI in the classroom. Read the full story.

—James O’Donnell

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 Nvidia says the US has lifted its ban on AI chip sales to China
Jensen Huang has sweet-talked Donald Trump into reversing his three-month old ban. (BBC)
+ The company will start selling its H20 chip to China. (WSJ $)
+ America may slap tariffs on a raw material used for chips and solar panels. (FT $)

2 China has launched its digital ID system
It’ll give the country even greater powers to surveil and censor its internet users. (WP $)

3 xAI has secured a contract with the US Department of Defense
Just days after its Grok chatbot had an anti-Semitic meltdown. (The Guardian)
+ EU officials are holding talks with X representatives after the outburst. (Bloomberg $)

4 Meta’s data centers are on the verge of triggering a major water shortage
Local residents in Newton County, Georgia are suffering. (NYT $)
+ But Zuckerberg wants to build gigawatt-size centers anyway. (Bloomberg $)
+ We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard. (MIT Technology Review)

5 The Trump administration is incinerating tons of emergency food
Rather than sending it to people in need. (The Atlantic $)

6 The US is attempting to revive its rare-earth industry
The Pentagon has invested more than $1 billion in American firm MP Materials. (WSJ $)
+ It’s all part of a plan to counter China’s critical mineral dominance. (FT $)
+ This rare earth metal shows us the future of our planet’s resources. (MIT Technology Review)

7 AI nudifying apps are big business
They’re making millions of dollars a year, and rely on tech built by US companies. (Wired $)
+ The viral AI avatar app Lensa undressed me—without my consent. (MIT Technology Review)

8 Can anything save the web at this point?
Traffic is dropping, and AI use is rising. (Economist $)
+ How to fix the internet. (MIT Technology Review)

9 Bytedance is working on its own mixed reality goggles
A couple of years after it scaled back its work on an AR and VR headset. (The Information $)
+ What’s next for smart glasses. (MIT Technology Review)

10 Minecraft has birthed a generation of entrepreneurs
The game encourages players to learn to program. (Insider $)

Quote of the day

“I suddenly felt pure, unconditional love.”

—Faeight, a woman ‘married’ to a chatbot named Gryff, describes her strong feelings for a previous AI partner, the Guardian reports.

One more thing

End of life decisions are difficult and distressing. Could AI help?

End-of-life decisions can be extremely upsetting for surrogates—the people who have to make those calls on behalf of another person. Friends or family members may disagree over what’s best for their loved one, which can lead to distressing situations.

David Wendler, a bioethicist at the US National Institutes of Health, and his colleagues have been working on an idea for something that could make things easier: an artificial intelligence-based tool that can help surrogates predict what the patients themselves would want in any given situation.

Wendler hopes to start building their tool as soon as they secure funding for it, potentially in the coming months. But rolling it out won’t be simple. Critics wonder how such a tool can ethically be trained on a person’s data, and whether life-or-death decisions should ever be entrusted to AI. Read the full story.

—Jessica Hamzelou

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet ’em at me.)

+ Did you know the shark in the Jaws poster isn’t actually a great white?
+ Japan’s Nakagin Capsule Tower was ahead of its time.
+ I love the Public Domain Image Archive.
+ Forums are far from dead—here are some of the best that are still alive and kicking.

Read more
1 452 453 454 455 456 3,214